KMID : 1188320150090050601
|
|
Gut and Liver 2015 Volume.9 No. 5 p.601 ~ p.606
|
|
Infliximab versus Cyclosporine Treatment for Severe Corticosteroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Korean, Retrospective, Single Center Study
|
|
Kim Eun-Hye
Kim Duk-Hwan Park Soo-Jung Hong Sung-Pil Kim Tae-Il Kim Won-Ho Cheon Jae-Hee
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Background/Aims:In patients with corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), cyclosporine or infliximab may be added to the treatment regimen to induce remission. Here, we aimed to compare the efficacy of cyclosporine and infliximab.
Methods:Between January 1995 and May 2012, the medical records of 43 patients with corticosteroid-refractory UC who received either infliximab or cyclosporine as a rescue therapy at a tertiary care hospital in Korea were reviewed.
Results:Among the 43 patients, 10 underwent rescue therapy with cyclosporine and the remaining 33 patients received infliximab. A follow-up of 12 months was completed for all patients. The colectomy rate at 12 months was 30% and 3% in the cyclosporine and the infliximab groups, respectively (p=0.034). However, the Cox proportional hazard model indicated that the treatment of rescue therapy was not an independent associate factor for preventing colectomy (p=0.164). In the subgroup analysis, infliximab with azathioprine was superior to cyclosporine for preventing colectomy (hazard ratio of infliximab with azathioprine compared with cyclosporine only, 0.073; 95% confidence interval, 0.008 to 0.629).
Conclusions:No difference between infliximab and cyclosporine with respect to preventing colectomy was noted. However, infliximab with azathioprine may be more effective than cyclosporine alone for preventing colectomy.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Colitis, ulcerative, Cyclosporine, Infliximab
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|